custody_injury · 2025-Q4
Unité des enquêtes spéciales (Ontario) · SIU case 25-OCI-511
Résumé caviardé
The evidence collected by the SIU, including interviews with the affected person and police eyewitnesses, and video footage that largely captured the events in question, gives rise to the following scenario. As was their legal right, the subject officer did not agree to an interview with the SIU or the release of their notes. In the morning of late 2025, acting on the authority of a Form 2 issued under the Mental Health Act, police officers attended an apartment in London. The form, authorizing police to compel the affected person’s attendance at hospital for a psychiatric examination, had been obtained. Concerns had been raised for the affected person’s well-being. Arriving at the apartment door, officers attempted to have the affected person exit the apartment. They explained who they were and why they were there. The affected person adamantly refused to leave the apartment. Behind a barricaded front door, the affected person variously threatened police that they would jump from the balcony and harm them or themselves if they entered the residence. Officers, including a member of the service’s crisis team, continued to negotiate with the affected person attempting to dissuade them from harming themselves or others. They assured the affected person that they would not face criminal charges, and that they would simply be escorting them to hospital. The affected person remained unreceptive. With information that the affected person might jump from the balcony and was repeatedly threatening their life and those of the officers, the service deployed a tactical team to the scene. The plan was to have the team prevent the affected person from using the balcony to jump from the building. The team arrived and prepared to intervene. As the officers were reaching the balcony, they were confronted by the affected person. With an aluminum baseball bat in hand, the affected person began to swing at the officers as they were still approaching, striking one of them. The subject officer managed to engage with the affected person and immediately became involved in a struggle. The two struggled, and the affected person fell to the ground. An officer deployed a CEW and the subject officer delivered a punch to the face of the affected person as they lay on the ground. Following the strike, the affected person’s hands were handcuffed. The affected person was taken to hospital after their arrest and diagnosed with multiple facial fractures.
Agent
93569f548a77 — Jeton HMAC-SHA256 stable pendant la durée du sel courant. Cliquer pour voir chaque incident associé à ce jeton à travers les corps policiers.
Source
Le Registre reflète le document original plutôt que de l'héberger à nouveau. Chaque incident publié pointe vers la copie archivée.